Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Olsten Kimberly Qualitycare, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1999No. CIV. 97-11 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hye S. Thompson (“Thompson”) brings this action against her former employer, Olsten Kimberly Qualitycare, Inc. (“Ol-sten”) alleging national origin discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. §§ 363.01-363.15, defamation, and negligent supervision and retention. In September 1997 the Court granted defendant Olsten’s motion to dismiss Thompson’s negligent supervision and retention claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hern v. Bankers Life Casualty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- P.G. v. Ramsey CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Burnett v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007