Legal Opinion
Sysco Corp v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 18, 2021No. 20200058-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2021 UT App 126
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SYSCO CORPORATION AND AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE, Petitioners, v. LABOR COMMISSION AND PAUL ROBERTS, Respondents. Opinion No. 20200058-CA Filed November 18, 2021 Original Proceeding in this Court Brad J. Miller, Attorney for Petitioners Brian D. Kelm, Attorney for Respondent Paul Roberts JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES DAVID N. MORTENSEN and RYAN M. HARRIS concurred. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, Judge: ¶1 While working as a salesperson for Sysco Corporation, Paul Roberts was injured in four work-related automobile…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bade-Brown v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Color Country Management v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Fastenal v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Ramos v. Cobblestone CentreUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Graphic Packaging Intl v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sysco Corp v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- BASF Corporation v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023