Legal Opinion
Reitman v. Wachovia National Bank, N.A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the petitioners’ contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment on the petition, inter alia, to direct the respondent to issue a satisfaction of the subject credit line mortgage pursuant to RPAPL 1921 (1) and granted that branch of the respondent’s cross motion which was for summary judgment on its first and second counterclaims. RPAPL 1921 (1), obligates a *760mortgagee to issue a satisfaction of a credit line mortgage, “on written request” therefor, “[a]fter payment of authorized principal, interest and any other amounts due…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Barclay's Bank of New York v. Market Street Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Merrill Lynch Equity Management, Inc. v. KleinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- HSBC Bank, USA v. PugkhemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA) v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA) v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- HSBC Mortgage Corp. v. PascoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- HSBC Mortgage Corp. v. PascoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.