Legal Opinion
Dayne Woods v. Jack Campbell, et al.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided November 4, 2025No. 3:23-cv-03287Unknown
1Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION DAYNE WOODS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:23-cv-03287-JEH ) ) JACK CAMPBELL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Order This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for costs. Defendants have moved the Court, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and Local Rule 54.1, for an Order imposing costs against Plaintiff and in their favor. As the prevailing party in this case, Defendants argue that they are entitled to costs, and Defendants represent that the costs that they incurred in this case for which they should be compensated is $…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Roller v. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Mother and Father v. James CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Constance DEIMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINCINNATI SUB-ZERO PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.