Legal Opinion

Alms v. Indiana County

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 179, April T., 1910, by defendant from order of C. P. Indiana Co., March T., 1910, No. 175, granting writ of mandamus in case of H. H. Alms v. Indiana County. Petition for writ of mandamus. Before Telfoed, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order granting the writ.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The appellee presented to the court below a petition setting forth that he was a duly appointed and commissioned “Deputy Game Protector” for the commonwealth, under the provisions of the Act of April 11, 1903, P. L. 163, entitled, “An act to provide for the appointment of deputy game protectors, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and defining their duties;” that said act provides that deputy game protectors, appointed under its provisions, shall “receive the same compensation that constables now receive for similar services;” that the Act of March 22, 1899, P. L. 17,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stegmaier v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Quinn v. Cumberland CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Dailey v. Potter CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Bennett v. Sullivan CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County Commissioners' Petition for the Construction of a Public Highway TunnelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Roush v. Northumberland CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Central Cambria School District v. County of Cambria, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API