Rehkopf v. Kuhland
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Pkessley, J., Charleston, August, 1888. This was an appeal by C. W. Kuhland, purchaser, from an order requiring him to comply with a bid made by him at a sale had under a decree in the main cause, which was an action for partition. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mk. Justice McIvek.
Under proper proceedings for the settlement of the estate of J. F. Kuhland, who died intestate, a lot of land in the city of Charleston as part of the estate of intestate was offered for sale by the master and bid off by the appellant, who declined to comply with his bid, upon the ground of alleged ■defects in the title of the intestate. At the instance of the parties to the action, a rule to show cause why he should not be required to comply with the terms of the sale was issued against appellant. To this rule he made a return,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Leventis v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Glover v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Leventis v. SOUTH CAROLINA DHECCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Cheatham v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908