Legal Opinion

Honolulu Paper Co. v. Makino

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1935No. 2190Published

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The ground of the motion is that the bond deposited does not comply with the statute and is therefore in the purview of the law no bond. Section 2509, R. L. 1925, which relates to appeals to this court from circuit judges at chambers, provides among other things that the appellant must within a specified time “deposit a sufficient bond in the sum of fifty dollars, conditioned for the payment of the costs further to accrue in case he is defeated in the appellate court.”

The objections raised to the bond are, first, thafiit runs to “Arthur Restarick, clerk…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Kahepu v. KingHawaii Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API