Legal Opinion

Almes v. Burket

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order denying Appellants’ Petition for Relief from Judgment of Non Pros. Appellants raise one issue for our resolution, “did the Appellant (sic) meet the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 3051(b) for relief from judgment of non pros?” We reverse and remand.

¶ 2 The facts relevant to our discussion follow: on October 23, 2003, Appellants filed a complaint that included, inter alia, a claim of professional negligence against Appellee, Myron Hay Tomb, Esquire,-relating to Tomb’s representation of Appellants in the purchase of real estate. The complaint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Hoover v. DavilaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Manson v. First National Bank in IndianaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Moyer v. Americana Mobile Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Alexander v. Jesray Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ditch v. Waynesboro HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Stroud v. Abington Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Reaves v. KnauerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. ESTATE OF ARANDA v. AmrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Czerniak v. Longshore, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API