De la Montanya v. De la Montanya
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to vacate a judgment. Charles W. Slack, Judge The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action prosecuted by the respondent for the custody of the children of plaintiff and defendant, James De La Montanya, Jr., appellant. The children are the other defendants. The facts in regard to the time of the commencement of the action, and the publication of summons, and the absence of the defendants from the state, are in all respects as in the *133divorce case No. 15596, just decided. Default was entered May 8,1894, and on the same day Francis E. Spencer was appointed guardian ad litem for the infant defendants. On the same day he filed an answer admitting all the allegations of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Titcomb v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Matter of MaginnisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Shannon v. Consolidated Tiger & Poorman Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- In Re KolbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Guardianship of CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.