Legal Opinion

In re Kahulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint foe. Malfeasance. Alleged malfeasance of a District Judge reviewed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

McCully, J.

Information by the Attorney-General charging that the above-named officer “ has committed offenses in his official capacity, such as render him totally unfit to hold the position of District Justice as aforesaid.” The specific charges are of corruptly demanding and receiving $12.50 from a plaintiff for whom he had rendered a judgment for $200, and for refusing to return $4, deposited with him for an action which was never brought. Also for repeated and long-continued absences from his district for periods of three successive weeks at various times, whereby…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellig v. Naglee & SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API