Legal Opinion

Hodges v. J. Spaulding & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

As the defendants had accepted the provisions of the employers’ liability act, Laws 1911, c. 163, the plaintiff cannot recover unless he shows that his injury was caused by the defendants’ failure to perform a duty the law imposed on them for his benefit, for at common law an employee assumes the risk of injuries caused by the negligence of his fellow-employees.

The plaintiff concedes that this is the law, but contends that the defendants are in fault because they failed to provide a competent foreman. In other words, he contends that Read was both incom petent and careless, that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Garland v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  2. Morrison v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  3. Minot v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  4. Brown v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  5. Shea v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jutras v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  2. Dubuc v. Amoskeag Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API