People v. Dortch
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti
After a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty of murder and attempt armed robbery and sentenced to a term of 28 years. The defendant on appeal contends that his arrest was illegal. Consequently, the defendant claims that the subsequent lineup, the in-court testimony concerning the lineup identification and the in-court identification should have been suppressed. Dortch also contends that he was denied a fair trial because he was not allowed to effectively confront the witnesses against him, because the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks and because the court improperly read the Prim…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leodis Dortch v. Michael O'Leary and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- People v. AveryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. PiersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. StoferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. SharrodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.