Legal Opinion

Austern v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 2, 1925No. A-12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*319MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

The evidence taken before the board of contract adjustment is by stipulation of the parties made a part of the evidence in this case. The evidence taken before the board is fuller and more complete than that taken in this court.

The board of contract adjustment found that the plaimiff was not entitled to recover, and that decision was approved by the Secretary of War. We are of opinion that that decision ivas right. See Decisions of the War Department Board of Contract Adjustment, vol. 1, p. 812, and vol. 6, p. 343, and especially see p. 344 of vol. 6, finding IX. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. United Gas & Electric Engineering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Morgan Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rock Run Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API