Legal Opinion

People v. Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

After a jury found defendant guilty of both criminal sale and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, he moved pursuant to CPL 330.30 (2) to set aside the verdict based upon evidence that, during the trial, a juror had improper out-of-court conversations about the case with a third party. County Court held a hearing and denied defendant’s motion, crediting the juror’s testimony that he had no knowledge of any prejudicial information as a result of the out-of-court communication. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to two concurrent prison terms of 12…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. IrizarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. GenoveseNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. ArtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. DarbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. TubbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API