Department of Transportation v. Auten
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Appellants argue, inter alia, that the trial court erred by holding that the DOT had a valid right of way across lots 31, 32 and 34. Specifically, appellant challenges the trial court’s holding that prior to 1 July 1959 the DOT was not required to record right of way agreements. We agree with the trial court and affirm.
This case is controlled by Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway Commission, 260 N.C. 587, 133 S.E.2d 464 (1963). In Kaperonis, the Highway Commission obtained a 100 foot right of way in 1928 for the purpose of constructing Wilkinson Boulevard. Apparently,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. WortmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Department of Transportation v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994