Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Auten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1992No. 9124SC678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Appellants argue, inter alia, that the trial court erred by holding that the DOT had a valid right of way across lots 31, 32 and 34. Specifically, appellant challenges the trial court’s holding that prior to 1 July 1959 the DOT was not required to record right of way agreements. We agree with the trial court and affirm.

This case is controlled by Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway Commission, 260 N.C. 587, 133 S.E.2d 464 (1963). In Kaperonis, the Highway Commission obtained a 100 foot right of way in 1928 for the purpose of constructing Wilkinson Boulevard. Apparently,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. WortmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Department of Transportation v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API