Legal Opinion
State v. Peck, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 2006No. C.A. No. 21354UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Thomas Peck appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a no-contest plea, for Aggravated Robbery. Peck contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements he made to investigating police officers upon the ground that they were not voluntary. Peck also contends that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for having failed to request a continuance of the suppression hearing to procure the attendance of a non-appearing witness.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the record supports the trial court's conclusion that Peck's…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. AekinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. Sidders, 14-08-24 (2-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Keeton, 14-07-48 (6-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Tharp, 07-Ca-9 (8-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008