Legal Opinion

Jarratt v. Trend Mills

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1976No. 75-3810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:

On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether Trend Mills [appellant] has a valid security interest in various assets of the debtor. Both the bankruptcy court and the district court found that, under the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC] as adopted by the state of Arizona,1 it did not. We reverse.

FACTS

On March 6, 1974, the debtor was adjudicated a bankrupt. In 1975, the bankruptcy *1240court held hearings to ascertain the nature and amount of the appellant’s interest in the debtor’s assets. It rejected the appellant’s contention that it had a valid security interest in any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howard W. Benedict, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Lillian E. Hargrove, D/B/A Hargrove Typesetting Service v. Morris LebowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Maricopa County v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re Sport ShackDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferdinand J. Snow Co. v. Waldick Aero-Space Devices, Inc. (In Re Waldick Aero-Space Devices, Inc.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
  2. Save-On-Carpets of Arizona, Inc. v. Trend MillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API