Commonwealth v. Schwartz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPrice, Judge
This appeal raises the question of whether a sentencing judge may utilize information adverse to a defendant, gained ex parte, and not disclosed at the time of sentencing. Although I answer that question in the negative and determine such a practice to be repugnant to a defendant’s due process rights, I would hold that under the facts of this case, the information was not so utilized.
On August 28,1978, appellant, pursuant to a plea bargain wherein he was to receive a probationary term and a fine determined by the court, entered a plea of guilty on four counts each of delivery of quaaludes and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.