Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Schwartz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1980No. 2497Published

1DissentPrice, Judge

This appeal raises the question of whether a sentencing judge may utilize information adverse to a defendant, gained ex parte, and not disclosed at the time of sentencing. Although I answer that question in the negative and determine such a practice to be repugnant to a defendant’s due process rights, I would hold that under the facts of this case, the information was not so utilized.

On August 28,1978, appellant, pursuant to a plea bargain wherein he was to receive a probationary term and a fine determined by the court, entered a plea of guilty on four counts each of delivery of quaaludes and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API