Hounsell v. North Conway Water Precinct
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The petitioners, Mark Hounsell and Joseph Smith, appeal an order of the Superior Court (O’Neill, J.) denying their request for disclosure of certain documents under the control of the respondent, North Conway Water Precinct (precinct). We affirm.
I. Background
The following facts were found by the trial court or appear on the record. In June 2003, the precinct, which is governed by a three-member board of commissioners, retained Municipal Resources, Inc. (MRI) to investigate the alleged mismanagement of the precinct. The precinct disclosed the resulting MRI report to the public. In November…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Concord v. TompkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Union Leader Corp. v. FennimanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Hanselv. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Professional Firefighters v. HealthTrust, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Chambers v. GreggSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas Reid v. New Hampshire Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Montenegro v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- ATV Watch v. New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Jeffrey Thomas Clay v. City of Dover & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Bosonetto v. Town of RichmondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.