Legal Opinion

Spokane Entrepreneurial Center v. Spokane Moves to Amend the Constitution

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2016No. 91551-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 Courts generally avoid reviewing ballot initiatives before they have been enacted into law, but a few limited types of challenges can be appropriately reviewed prior to election: procedural challenges (such as sufficiency of signatures and ballot titles) and challenges asserting that the initiative is not within the scope of the legislative authority granted to local residents. The first issue in this case is who has standing to bring those types of challenges. The Court of Appeals created new limits on who can bring such challenges, but we reverse and adhere to our existing standards…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Global Neighborhood v. Respect WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Port Of Tacoma v. Save Tacoma WaterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State v. Econ. Dev. Bd. for Tacoma-Pierce Cnty.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Protect Pub. Health v. FreedWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. 21st Mortgage Corp. v. Linda C. Nicholls Duncan K. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API