Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 6, 2009No. 04 Civ. 3417 (SAS); No. 00 MDL 1898 (SAS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2003, the City of New York (the “City”) filed a Complaint against various corporations for their use and handling of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”), alleging that the MTBE contaminated — or threatened to contaminate — the City’s groundwater supply.1 *449Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”) — the only remaining non-settling defendant — moves in limine to preclude the City from introducing evidence of past or future investigation and treatment costs until the City proves actual injury to its…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe") ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API