City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2003, the City of New York (the “City”) filed a Complaint against various corporations for their use and handling of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”), alleging that the MTBE contaminated — or threatened to contaminate — the City’s groundwater supply.1 *449Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”) — the only remaining non-settling defendant — moves in limine to preclude the City from introducing evidence of past or future investigation and treatment costs until the City proves actual injury to its…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe") ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009