Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 15, 2004No. CIV.A.99-2496(GK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KESSLER, District Judge.

This matter is now before the Court on the Government’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That Each Defendant Is Distinct from the RICO Enterprise, That a Defendant’s Liability for RICO Conspiracy Does Not Require That Defendant To Participate in the Operation or Management of the Enterprise, and That RICO Liability Extends to Aiders and Abettors (“Motion”). Upon consideration of the Motion, Defendants’ Opposition, the Reply, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. RSM Production Corp. v. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer U.S. LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Hengle v. AsnerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API