Legal Opinion

H. Michaelyan, Inc. v. New Jersey Guaranty & Plate Glass Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Untermyer, J. (after stating the facts as above).

This is one of those cases — always hard cases —■ where the question to be decided is which of two innocent parties shall suffer from the wrong of a third. The decision is rendered particularly difficult because it is impossible to determine the facts out of which the suit arises with any degree of certainty. The Dulanys and Devoe are the only persons to whom the facts are fully known, but of these the Dulanys did not testify and Devoe, who testified at the trial, is unworthy of belief. In this obscurity, the facts must be ascertained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Marshall v. Reading Fire Insurance Co. of ReadingNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. H. Michaelyan, Inc. v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herbert Construction Company, Cross-Appellant v. Continental Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API