Legal Opinion

Bankers Trust Co. v. Russell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1933No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 36,805PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

While the facts in these cases are somewhat different from those presented in Equitable Trust Co. v. Milton Realty Co., ante, 571, in our opinion, decision is controlled thereby. In all of them promissory notes were executed by the mortgagors, payable to the Bankers Trust Company, plaintiff, at certain dates fixed therein. These notes were secured by real estate mortgages on certain property in the city of Detroit, in which the trust company, its successors and assigns, was named as the mortgagee. In the eighth paragraph thereof appeared a provision so similar to that appearing in paragraphs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Giblin v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API