Legal Opinion

Warner v. Oriel Glass Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 18, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, P. J.

— The deceased husband of plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant, when he met with the occurrence which occasioned his death. The pertinent alleged negligence is thus stated in the petition:

“Plaintiff further states that at-all times herein mentioned, on and prior to the 4th day of October, 1922, she was the lawful wife of Joseph Warner, who died in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, on the said 4th day of October, 1922, as hereinafter more particularly described, and that plaintiff now is the surviving widow of said Joseph Warner, deceased, and institutes and prosecutes this suit as such…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Curtis v. McNairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Noyes v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Potts v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Leavitt v. St. Louis Public Service CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Padilla v. WinsorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Murray v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Schneider v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API