Legal Opinion

Williams Bros. v. Bank of Blue Mountain

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1923No. 23137PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

(After stating the facts as above). As we understand the assignments of error, they are to the effect' that the court below erred. (1) in rendering a decree against Humphrey and Hughes at the special teim, for the reason that the cause was not triable at the regular term; (2) in including in the-decree against Humphrey and Hughes the attorney’s fee agreed to he paid by Williams Bros, in the note sued on; (3) in taxing Humphrey and Hughes with all the costs incurred in the court below.

Another assignment of error does complain of the provision in the decree that Humphrey and Hughes are liable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daley v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hatto v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dependents of Dawson v. Delta Western Exploration Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rayl v. ThurmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cruse v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gortney v. City of New AlbanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Paine Plumbing & Supply Co. v. McMurtray's EstateMississippi Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API