Legal Opinion

Minnesota Life Insurance Co. v. Rings

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 7, 2017No. Case No. 2:16-cv-149Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

' Terence P. Kemp, United States Magistrate Judge

This insurance dispute arose, unfortunately, out of a murder-suicide that took place on September 2, 2015. As the undisputed facts of the case show, on that day, David Rings shot his wife Teresa and then shot himself. Mr, Rings had life insurance through his employer, Abbot Laboratories. He had named his wife as the sole beneficiary, but the policies (there are two of them with identical terms) contain language which specifies when a named beneficiary who dies at roughly the same time as the policyholder is still entitled to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1341, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23937j Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Julie A. Marsh, Dana Lyn Weaver and James R. Marsh, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. McMillan v. ParrottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Lake v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1097, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23919g Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mary M. Pressley, Personal Representative for the Estate of Alvin J. Pressley, Deceased, Barbara J. PressleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API