Legal Opinion

Melish v. New York Consolidated Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to set aside verdict as excessive.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

The authority conferred upon the trial court by section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside a verdict because the same is for excessive damages, involves the exercise of a sound judicial discretion. The power in a proper case must be exercised. The courts, as was said by Mr. Justice Cullen in Meade v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 3 App. Div. 432, “ are very chary of interfering with the award of damages made by juries, but there must come a point at which it is our duty to intervene.” In the present case, the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $48,000 for personal injuries. He is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mullady v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Meade v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halloran v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  2. Rosen v. Sterling Symphony, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
  3. Monroe v. LeonardCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API