Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coghlan v. Cuskelly

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1932No. File No. 6071Published

1Dissent

Christianson, Ch. J.

(dissenting). The great question presented, for determination in this case is whether a signer on a recall petition may withdraw his name therefrom beforq the officer with whom it is. required to be filed has determined the sufficiency thereof, and called the election. The question thus presented is one of great importance and affects the rights of every individual elector in the state. The answer to the question must be sought, and found, in the constitutional provision relating to the recall. The language of that provision is such as to render the question one of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Littell v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Laam v. McLarenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Sim v. RosholtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. La Londe v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State ex rel. Laird v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API