Legal Opinion

Spadel v. Household Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Spadel)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1983No. 19-10434PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The threshold issue in the case at bench is whether the claim of the third mortgagee is an “unsecured claim” within the meaning of section 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). We conclude that, since there is no equity in the debtors’ residence over and above the first two mortgages, the claim of the third mortgagee is unsecured pursuant to section 506(a).

The second issue presented herein is whether the debtors can avoid the lien of the third mortgagee under section 506(d) of the Code. We conclude that, since no party in interest, including…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nefferdorf v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Nefferdorf)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In Re GrahamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. In Re McKayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re Benjamin Pierce Simmons, Bankrupt. Benjamin Pierce Simmons v. J.T. SavellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. In the Matter of Paul D. Folendore and Helen H. Folendore, Debtors. Paul D. Folendore and Helen H. Folendore v. U.S. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Caster v. United States (In Re Caster)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. In Re HynsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  5. In Re HarrisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API