Legal Opinion
River Plate & Brazil Conferences v. Pressed Steel Car Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 17, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
These are three motions, one by defendant for summary judgment, another by plaintiffs for a stay of proceedings and a third by the Federal Maritime Board for leave to intervene. The action is one by the River Plate and Brazil Conferences, an association of common carriers by water organized pursuant to Section 15 of the Shipping Act of 1916,1 to recover damages allegedly sustained by plaintiffs in consequence of an alleged breach of contract by defendant of its freight agreement with plaintiffs. The *89complaint, filed October 6, 1953, alleges that on or about September…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- El Dorado Oil Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- River Plate and Brazil Conferences v. Pressed Steel Car Company, Inc., Federal Maritime Board, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- District of Columbia, Department of Public Works v. L.G. Industries, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- American Union Transport, Inc. v. River Plate & Brazil ConferencesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954