Le v. Nitetown, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
_JjThe plaintiffs, Richard Le and Edward Prince (collectively referred to as the “plaintiffs”), were injured by bouncers employed by the defendant, Nitetown, Inc. (Nitetown). The jury found that Nite-town’s conduct was intentional in part and negligent in part and awarded damages to both plaintiffs. The jury further found that Mr. Le was twenty percent negligent in causing his injuries. In its judgment, the trial court reduced the damage awards to the plaintiffs for the comparative negligence of Mr. Le. Both plaintiffs appeal the reduction in their damages. Finding…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Landry v. BellangerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. State ex rel. DOTDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Turner v. Shop Rite, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Giles Hill v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Guillot v. GuillotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Justin Irwin v. John Bradley BrentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.