Legal Opinion
Murray Lighterage & Transp. Co. v. B. Turecamo Contracting Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 17, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
On Sunday, July 4,1926, libelant’s deck-scow, Murray River, was injured. Her owners have sued the Tureeamo company and the tug Margaret Moran, alleging that the berth to which the tug Moran towed the Murray River and at which the scow was damaged, was unsafe and known to be unsafe. The Tureeamo company impleaded the Gahagan company et ah, alleging that if the berth was unsafe and the deckseow was so damaged, that it was. due entirely to the fault of the impleaded parties. The issue to be decided is one largely of fact.
I find from the testimony that this deck-scow Murray…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Higgins v. Lynn Gas-Light Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1887
- Ætna Ins. v. Davidson S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- Reilly v. Tuohy & Upton, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1921
- Smith v. GouldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Red Star Barge Line, Inc. v. Lizza Asphalt Construction Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958