Legal Opinion

Piekarsky v. Rossman

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1951No. 508Published

1Opinion of the Court

WARLICK, District Judge.

This is a civil action tried by the court without a jury under the rules and involves a controversy between the parties to the action over the terms of a contract for the purchase and sale of certain nylon yam. Jurisdiction of the cause comes about on the grounds of the diversity of citizenship and the amount alleged in the controversy. From a hearing of the evidence the following facts appear to be warranted and as such are found by the court.

On January 14, 1950, the plaintiff, Paul Piekarsky, trading as Rivercrest Fabrics, a resident of Patterson, New Jersey, came to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. American Lumber Co. v. Quiett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Berbarry v. . TombacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API