Legal Opinion

Castro v. Ogburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 1996No. 92C-10319; CA A87239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*124BUTTLER, S. J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in dismissing this action with prejudice on the day of trial because plaintiff had not substituted the personal representative of defendant,1 who had died shortly after this action was commenced, within one year after his death, ORCP 34 B(2), even though the personal representative had voluntarily appeared in the action and had invoked the authority of the court during pre-trial discovery and appeared ready for trial on the trial date.

Plaintiff's decedent was killed when she was struck by a car driven by defendant while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mendez v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Linster v. East Lake Health Resort, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In re the Marriage of SalchenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Bisbee v. MallicottOregon Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Windorf v. MalcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Henry v. DanielNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. C. O. Homes, LLC v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. C. O. Homes, LLC v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Castro v. OgburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API