Legal Opinion

Estate of C.W.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

The issue presented in this case is whether a guardian with authority to consent to a tubal ligation should be appointed for C.W., a 24 year old mute woman with a mental age of 3-5. She suffers from moderately severe retardation, grand mal epilepsy, cerebral palsy and scoliosis. The trial court determined that it was in C.W.’s best interest that her mother be appointed as her guardian, with specific authority to consent to a laparoscopic tubal ligation.

The trial court’s decision reflects an exceedingly careful consideration of the voluminous record and is in accord with the law of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GradySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. In Re SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Matter of TerwilligerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elizabeth J. Arnold Lake Justin Wilson Lake, Husband and Wife v. Frederick S. Arnold Audrey L. Arnold, Husband and Wife Daniel M. Friday M.D. Tyrone Hospital Ralph W. Crawford M.DCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Lake v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. In re the Guardianship of B., New York County Courts2002
  4. Hallowich v. Range Res. Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County2013
  5. Hallowich v. Range Resources Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API