United States v. Manuel Acosta-Garcia, United States of America v. Florencio Urias-Montoya
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEHER, District Judge:
Appellants were arrested, indicted and, after jury trial, convicted of unlawful importation of marihuana pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 176a.
At the beginning of trial, as appellants were being brought into the courtroom, some members of the panel of prospective jurors saw that appellants were in handcuffs which appellants contend created a prejudicial atmosphere not dissipated by the trial court’s admonition that appellants’ custody was not to be equated with guilt. Appellants specify this as error.
We do not agree. The mere fact that some prospective members of the jury may…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Richard E. Loux and Neil Conrad Wallen v. United States of America, Vertis James Barrett, Arthur St. Peter Andharold Oscar Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Richard C. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Al TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Misenheimer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Larry HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Snellen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Manuel Benjamin Figueroa-Espinoza, United States of America v. Eugenio Nido-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.