Legal Opinion

King County v. Viracon Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 15, 2022No. 2:19-cv-00508Unknown

1Opinion

1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 KING COUNTY, 9 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-508-BJR v. 10 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 11 VIRACON, INC., RECONSIDERATION RE ADDITIONAL RULE 60 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 King County instituted this action against Defendants Viracon, Inc. (“Viracon”), Quanex 17 IG Systems Inc. (“Quanex”), and TruSeal Technologies Inc. (“TruSeal”) in April 2019, alleging 18 claims related to windows manufactured by Viracon and installed on an office building…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. MCI WorldcomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Coastal Transfer Co. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Rose Maree Jones v. Aero/chem Corp. And Athea Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. English v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Juan Parrilla-Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API