Legal Opinion
Hensler v. MacYsyn (In Re Hensler)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 22, 2000No. 19-11752PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM H. GINDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This dispute arises out of Joseph and Kathryn Hensler’s (collectively the “Hen-slers” or “debtors”) motion to enforce the bankruptcy discharge against the holder of a subsequent state court judgment. Specifically, in a post-confirmation action the New Jersey Division of Worker’s Compensation ruled that the debtors were liable to both Jeffrey Macysyn (“Macysyn”) and New Jersey’s Uninsured Employer’s Fund for the discharged debt. Debtors allege that the state court judgment is void pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 524 of the Bankruptcy Code.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wolf v. Tzanides (In re Tzanides)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Waterson v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Foley, Inc. v. Fevco, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Eastman v. Baker Recovery Services and Law Offices of Juana Trejo (In re Eastman)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.