Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Interstate Transit Corp.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 28, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us upon the defendant’s motion to establish the truth of its exception. In the superior court the trial justice denied the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and to this ruling the defendant duly excepted. Thereupon the case was submitted to the jury, which was unable to agree upon a verdict. Following the jury’s disagreement, the defendant’s bill of exceptions was not allowed by the trial justice, but it seeks now to establish the truth of its exception to the ruling of the trial justice, denying its motion for a directed verdict.

Counsel for the defendant contends…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savage v. Mark Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955
  2. Bristol Co. W. Auth. v. State Labor Relations Board, 2002-0936 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  3. McAninch v. StateSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Pizzi v. R.I. State L.R.B., 02-0161 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API