Legal Opinion

Vito L. v. Filomena L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1991PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), dated June 22, 1989, as, after a hearing, denied his motion to compel the defendant and her infant child to submit to a human leucocyte antigen blood-grouping test.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This is an action for a divorce in which the plaintiff husband sought an order directing the defendant wife and the infant child, now nine years old and born during the marriage, to submit to a human…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Ettore I. v. Angela D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fung v. FungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Estate of BonannoNew York Surrogate's Court · 2002
  3. Walker v. CovingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Murtagh v. MurtaghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Catherine A. v. David B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API