Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. Peyson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 5, 1988No. 87 C 4849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Ardelbert and Carline Flournoy (collectively “Flournoys”) have sued Walter Pey-son (“Peyson”) and William Joseph (“Joseph”), asserting:

1. a violation of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) § 10(b), 15 U.S. C. § 78j(b), and SEC Rule 10b-5 (collectively “Section 10(b)”) arising out of Flournoys’ purchase from Peyson of securities in two corporations of which he was President;

2. a violation of Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) § 17(a), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a) (“Section 17(a)”);

3. a violation of 1933 Act § 12(2), 15 U.S.C. § 77(l)(2)…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re First Chicago Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  2. In Re VMS Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. Bonfield v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  4. Vt Investors v. R & D FUNDING CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  5. Rand Bond of North America, Inc. v. Saul Stone & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API