Flournoy v. Peyson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Ardelbert and Carline Flournoy (collectively “Flournoys”) have sued Walter Pey-son (“Peyson”) and William Joseph (“Joseph”), asserting:
1. a violation of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) § 10(b), 15 U.S. C. § 78j(b), and SEC Rule 10b-5 (collectively “Section 10(b)”) arising out of Flournoys’ purchase from Peyson of securities in two corporations of which he was President;
2. a violation of Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) § 17(a), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a) (“Section 17(a)”);
3. a violation of 1933 Act § 12(2), 15 U.S.C. § 77(l)(2)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re First Chicago Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- In Re VMS Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Bonfield v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Vt Investors v. R & D FUNDING CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Rand Bond of North America, Inc. v. Saul Stone & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.