Bush v. State

Plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as defendant) prosecutes error to review the record of his conviction of the offenses of unlawful possession of a still, mash and intoxicating liquors.

Defendant insists that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence certain exhibits, because their possession had been obtained by virtue of a search warrant that was issued upon a complaint which was not sworn to by an officer of the state or county, or a creditable freeholder of the county, and because the warrant did not describe with certainty *386the premises to be searched. No objection is raised…