Legal Opinion
Slaughter & Veal v. Schneider
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 9, 1926No. 1945. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Bob Slaughter and G. T. Veal, composing the partnership of Slaughter & Veal, sued Schneider to recover 44 head of cattle alleged to belong to the firm. Slaughter also sued Schneider to recover 22 head alleged to belong to him personally. Writs of .sequestration were issued, and the cattle seized thereunder. Subsequently the cattle were replevied by the plaintiffs.
-'By agreement the cases were consolidated and tried as one.
Schneider bought the cattle from Rucker. Rucker bought from W. IT. Rogers, who, in mailing the sale, undertook to act as agent for the plaintiffs. Schneider answered to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. McLeanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Connellee v. NeesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Wells v. LittlefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Moore v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hearn v. Hanlon-Buchanan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Yellow Cab Co. v. McCloskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Freeborn v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938