Casteel v. Davidson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey
I. Introduction
In this child support case, we address whether and to what extent an inheritance may be included in a parent's gross income for purposes of determining child support obligations. The trial court concluded that the principal of an inheritance can be included in gross income, but only to the extent that the beneficiary relies on the principal as *742a source of income. The remainder of the principal, the court held, should be counted as an asset, and any interest generated by this asset should be included in the parent's gross income. The court of appeals disagreed, holding that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Winn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Humphreys v. DeRossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In Re the Marriage NimmoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Cody v. Evans-CodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re AMDSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003