Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Stepski v. Harford
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
The District Attorney of Orange county appeals as of right under subdivision 1 of section 588 of the Civil Practice Act from an order of the Appellate Division unanimously affirming an order of the Orange County Special Term sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and discharging the relator from the custody .of the sheriff.
The learned Special Term justice said: “ This writ of habeas corpus originally returned in the County Court has been transferred to the Supreme Court informally and a ruling requested as to the constitutionality of section 7-14.4 of the Plumbing Code of the City of Newburgh,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- People ex rel. Stepski v. HarfordNew York Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Spielvogel v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Schroeder v. BinksIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Fisher Mechanical Corp. v. Gateway Demolition Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Local Bd. of Health of Berkeley Tp. v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.