Booth v. Hynes
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
The only question presented by this record, which we deem necessary to be considered, is, whether the evidence sustains the finding of the jury.
The declaration is in assumpsit, and contains only the common counts. An extended account, with the various items specified, was filed with the declaration, showing the character of the claim of the plaintiffs against the defendants.
It. appears, from the evidence, that in 1866 the appellants were the owners of several leases for certain “ oil wells ” or “ oil well ” property, in Venango county, Pennsylvania. In May, of that year, they entered into a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bidders v. RileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Southworth v. HoagIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by12 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. KirchoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Harts v. EmeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Koch v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Huebsch v. ScheelIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Primm v. LeggIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.