Legal Opinion

Vance v. Northern Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in its apportionment of the legal fees awarded to respondent, Dixon & Hamilton, L. L. P. (Dixon), the firm substituted for petitioner, DeMarie & Schoenborn, P. C. (DeMarie), as *852counsel for plaintiff. The partners of Dixon were formerly employed as associates by DeMarie. DeMarie and its former employees entered into an agreement providing that an associate who brought a client to the firm would receive 60% of the fee charged to that client and the firm…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Grasso v. KubisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Marie & Schoenborn, P.C. v. LoncarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API