Legal Opinion
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Goldberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 2015No. 2014-02073PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Adam Goldberg and Marlaine Goldberg appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated October 31, 2013, as, in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff has standing where it is the holder or assignee of the underlying note at the time the action is commenced (see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aurora Loan Services v. Monique TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. CollymoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. NagelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Grassi & Co. v. Janover Rubinroit, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Capital One v. Brooklyn Flatiron, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bank of America, N.A. v. O'GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. OsorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LeonardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018