Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Chandler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Wharton. Tried below before the Hon. Nelson H. Hunger. The facts are stated in the Opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

The plaintiff below, (who is defendant in error in this Court,) brought suit against the defendants below, (plaintiffs in error,) on a joint promissory note, executed by the defendants and one J. W. Lann, who was not named as defendant, and against whom there was no judgment. The other makers of the note having failed to appear, judgment was entered against them by default, and they say there was error in not making Lann a party and not rendering judgment against him, or showing some reason why the same was not done.

The general rule is, that all joint obligors or contractors…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ebell v. BursingerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. YanowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Monday v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Davis v. WillisTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Oliver v. HuckinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API